Cache directory "/home/content/f/w/s/fwschmidt/html/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/ttftitles/cache" is not writable.What do I really believe happens when we die

September 20th, 2010

I was invited to contribute to a feature at Patheos.com called  “What do I really believe…”  The subject in this first feature is the question, “What do I really believe happens when we die?”

It isn’t a trivial question, nor is it purely academic.  The way any story ends decisively shapes what we make of everything that led up to the end; and the same is true of life.  And, while we don’t know in one sense what will happen, nor does anyone know in detail (how could you?), like any other set of choices, what we believe happens when we die, makes a huge difference in the way we live.

Put another way: The end may not justify the means, but it certainly shapes our choice of means.

So, you will find my contribution at:

http://www.patheos.com/Resources/Additional-Resources/Frederick-W-Schmidt-Afterlife.html

And the front page of the feature at:

http://www.patheos.com/Resources/Additional-Resources/Frederick-W-Schmidt-Afterlife.html

Join the conversation.  It is important to know what you believe about the way your own story ends.

Cache directory "/home/content/f/w/s/fwschmidt/html/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/ttftitles/cache" is not writable.The One

September 20th, 2010

Someone once said, “To the world you may be one person, but to one person you may be the world.”

Both the former and the latter are inevitably true.

Even people who enjoy considerable fame mean very little to most of us.  They may represent or embody some measure of shared longing or common commitments, but as individuals they are strangers; and the attention that their lives receive often deludes us into thinking we know them better than we do.  What we know about them is, in fact, what we are told about them and nothing more.

“Famous people” — who don’t appear to be one among many — are placeholders of a kind.  It would be a mistake for us to think that they have transcended the very human obstacles to loving and finding love; and it would be a serious mistake for them to think that their notoriety is a substitute for loving and being loved.

To think we can mean everything to everyone is grandiosity; to think we do mean everything to everyone is narcissism.   And both are huge obstacles to healthy loving relationships.

There are countless gifts in owning that we are one among many…

  • the gift of putting God first in our lives and of trusting those we love to the only one who can finally bring balance and meaning to their lives
  • the gift of humility, which allows us to shed the burdens of grandiosity and the suffocating preoccupation of narcissism
  • the gift of real relationships in which we are loved for the person we are, rather than the role or aspirations we may or may not fulfill
  • the gift of giving love, which frees us from most of life’s more soul-destroying selfishness
  • and the gift of participation in the life of God, who is the source of our capacity for love

Cache directory "/home/content/f/w/s/fwschmidt/html/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/ttftitles/cache" is not writable.Tom and Brandon

September 19th, 2010

This morning’s New York Times features a frontpage article that tells the story of Tom and Brandon.  They are cousins who shared in life’s adventures and, in recent months, battled advanced, aggressive forms of melanoma.

The standard of care doesn’t work, but a trial drug does — or at a minimum, has promising results.  And in the case of patients with aggressive cancers, a bit of relief or some measure of progress is the most that you can hope to achieve.

Tom and Brandon entered a drug trial that was testing the promise of this new drug, but one (Tom) was randomized (chosen) to receive the trial drug and the other (Brandon) was given the standard of care —which everyone knows doesn’t work.  On the face of it, such practices were established to insure patient safety and the scientific integrity of test results.  But every set of rules can become a blunt and brutal instrument in the hands of people who refuse to exercise moral responsibility. Because of those rules, Brandon (whose health began to fail dramatically) was unable to find anyone who would give him the trial drug.  So, not long ago Tom buried his cousin.

Scientific standards, rules for patient safety, and fiscal responsibility are all legitimate concerns in the real world of medicine where practice comes up hard against the limits of our knowledge and resources.  But for the practice of medicine to be moral, physicians need to make judgments based upon the needs of their patients.

In this case the rules came up hard against the bureaucratization of moral judgment and a young man was condemned to death in the name of learning something we already knew.

Recent debates about health care seem to assume at some level that if we create legislative structures and programs that enshrine certain values, then we will guarantee that everyone will receive the care they should receive or, at a minimum, the care that is reasonably available.  That is quite simply not true.  The rules that were applied in this case were designed to avoid the horrors of the past, but blindly applied, they took the life of a young man.

Most of us will never have the opportunity to shape the legislative process in any direct way, but we do have the responsibility to resist approaches to the challenges we face that assign moral responsibility to the blunt, unthinking application of rules to the lives of those in need.  And that is true of almost any moral challenge — they cannot be evaded, dispatched with legislation, or dealt with once and for all by creating a list of rules — at the heart of every moral dilemma is someone like Tom, Brandon, you, and me.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/19/health/research/19trial.html?_r=1&hp

Cache directory "/home/content/f/w/s/fwschmidt/html/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/ttftitles/cache" is not writable.The Teflon Directee

September 18th, 2010

Surprisingly — or perhaps not so surprisingly — some people seek spiritual direction without ever intending to follow it.  Like some who seek therapy, they prefer to discuss the challenges they face, rather than transcend them.  They seem to be made of Teflon.  Nothing you tell them seems to stick.

Behavior of this kind can be willful — the refusal to respond to respond to God’s prompting — but more often than not there are deeper issues:

In some cases, the directee has yet to understand the deepest roots of the spiritual challenge he or she faces.  Unseen and unnamed struggles continue to disrupt the spiritual progress they might otherwise make.  More listening is still needed.

Other directees fear the changes that transformation might bring.  Spiritual growth is a good thing, but it is also inherently disruptive.  And it takes effort to live into the changes that it brings.  Some directees will evade the responsibility for living into those changes as long as possible.

When the prospect of change is daunting, it is also easy to identify what is familiar with what is good.   When that happens, the familiar can enslave us — we reinvent the patterns that are comfortable.

That’s important information for a spiritual director, but it is also important information for spiritual directees.  If you see Teflon behavior surfacing in your life, ask God for the spiritual imagination to identify the source of your resistance, and the strength to break free.

Cache directory "/home/content/f/w/s/fwschmidt/html/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/ttftitles/cache" is not writable.What does a Yoda do

September 17th, 2010

Real Yodas in the workplace and in on-on-one relationships function in a way that is very different from the patterns I described yesterday.

Real Yodas start with the young yedi knight…

The people I have known who functioned like true mentors always put their apprentice first.  They may have had their own agendas, anxieties, responsibilities, and frustrations — but they set those aside to give their full attention to the person they were mentoring.

Real Yodas find a place for young Jedi to grow…

They looked for places where their apprentice would grow.  The agenda wasn’t a matter of getting a job done or one of hazing.  They thought developmentally about the needs of their apprentice, they looked for experiences that would contribute to their growth.

Real Yodas share their wisdom.

They didn’t use what they knew to manipulate or control.  They shared it with their apprentices.  In that way they prepared their apprentices and preserved a growing body of knowledge.

Real Yodas walk with their apprentices and find themselves with friends.

Launching an apprentice was only half of the work.  Caring enough to walk with them through life and encourage them mattered as much as the early stages of the relationship.  The gift in it for Yodas was the apprentice became a friend and peer.

Cache directory "/home/content/f/w/s/fwschmidt/html/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/ttftitles/cache" is not writable.There is no Yoda

September 16th, 2010

Famously, Yoda observes, “Always two there are, no more, no less: a master and an apprentice.”

“Well, yes, if lucky you are.”

But in my experience of sending students off to mother church — and in an ecumenical setting, there are lots of mothers — I have watched in horror at the number of those apprentices who are forced to travel alone.

It’s a dynamic worth describing, because in most cases you have either been an apprentice or you have the opportunity to be a master.  How you handle those experiences is a spiritual issue.

So, in the interest of candor — what happens to young Jedi Knights in the nascent 21st century?

HAZING…It is an ancient ritual with roots in human barbarism, but in some quarters it has not died out.  Its inspiration lies in the emotional satisfaction that it gives the Faux Yoda.  To humiliate is to feel superior and so much the better if pointless rituals and endless hoops extend the experience.

SLAVE LABOR…The apprentice could be valued, nurtured, and trained.  But in the words of despair.com, “You can do anything you set your mind to when you have vision, determination, and an endless supply of expendable labor” and far too many Faux Yodas know it.  As a result, all too often the apprentice is saddled with work that the master would rather not do.

THE GENEROSITY OF COWARDS…Some apprentices are in the wrong place trying to do the wrong thing; and the masters are often so conflict-adverse that they fail to tell the truth.  As a consequence some apprentices turn slowly at the end of a rope — encouraged to endure, but with no real future.

NEGLECT…Other apprentices find themselves saddled with masters who have no ambition to be Yodas.  They are so captive to fear, ambition, or both that they are incapable of aiding their apprentices.

There may be other patterns, but those are the ones I have seen more often than not in over three decades of work between the academy and the church.  If all of this leaves most young Jedis feeling as if they have been stranded on Tatooine, it is not surprising.

The problem with such behavior — in any work world — is that it debases the apprentice and it robs institutions of the wisdom that could be transmitted with careful attention to the needs of the apprentice.  Worse yet, it is the kind of behavior that breeds cynicism and nothing corrodes or weakens the spiritual moorings of any community than the disaffection that follows on well-fed cynicism.

What to do about it tomorrow.

Cache directory "/home/content/f/w/s/fwschmidt/html/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/ttftitles/cache" is not writable.The significance of planting trees

September 15th, 2010

According to Nelson Henderson, “The true meaning of life is to plant trees under whose shade you do not expect to sit.”  He is remembered only because his son Wes wrote a fairly simple and poorly edited work chronicling his family’s life in the Swan River Valley of Canada.  Henderson moved from Ireland to settle in Ontario, moved further west to settle in Manitoba.  He fought in the trenches during World War I and returned to marry, farm, and raise three children.

Perhaps the most enduring lesson of the book was this single aphorism that his son Wes attributes to his father.  But if you were going to be remembered for a single sentiment, there are worse life philosophies for which to be remembered.

Most of us are taught to assume that the efforts we make in this life should somehow rebound to our own credit.  And most of the goals we are encouraged to achieve are closely associated with the narrow horizons of our own lives.  Some of us, sadly, even measure what succeeding generations should or should not have based upon our own fortunes.

But in a very real sense, a developed spirituality leads us into a life poured out for others, lived in the hope that subsequent generations will benefit from our efforts — whatever the gain might be in our own lifetime. If that sounds like the life of Jesus, it is hardly a coincidence.

But Henderson’s image might provide a new window into his life that provides us a fresh perspective.  When we talk about the sacrifice of Jesus we tend to think in categories that apply to him alone as Son of God or as Savior, or we think in terms of the ultimate sacrifice that Jesus made on the cross.

But in identifying with our lives, there was also something far more mundane, commonplace, and daily in the shape of his spirituality — planting trees whose shade he knew he would not enjoy.  It was that self giving that shaped not just a few moments in his life, but shaped the character of the way in which he lived

And that is something we can all do.

Cache directory "/home/content/f/w/s/fwschmidt/html/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/ttftitles/cache" is not writable.Obstacles and Problems

September 13th, 2010

Ken Hakuta is an inventor and the host of “The Dr. Fad Show,” a children’s show devoted to conversations about inventions.  That’s the extent of what I know about Mr. Hakuta, but he makes an important observation:

“Lack of money is no obstacle.  Lack of an idea is an obstacle.”

Depending on your life’s circumstances, Mr. Hakuta’s observation could be heard in more than one way:

You might hear him telling you:

“You talk a lot about money being an obstacle.  That’s not an obstacle.  The real obstacle is the absence of ideas.  You already have an idea, so now what are you going to do?”

Heard from that perspective, Mr. Hakuta’s observation is invitation to find a strategy for implementing your idea.

Listening from another place in life, you might hear him saying:

“You talk about money being an obstacle, but that’s no obstacle.  You would only be facing a real obstacle if you didn’t have an idea.  So, don’t let limited resources hold you back.  You have an idea, devote what you have to the effort.”

Heard from this perspective, Mr. Hakuta’s words are a call to arms, the resolve to act.

Listening from still another perspective, what you might hear is this:

“You talk about money being an obstacle, that’s no obstacle. But you have an idea and all you talk about is money.  Stop stalling.”

Heard from that perspective, Mr. Hakuta’s words are a challenge, a call to commitment.

Over the past few years I have lost count of the number of people who complain that they don’t have the money needed to accomplish what God has called them to do.  It has become a national epidemic — a rationale for diminished dreams, an excuse for smaller visions and diminished dreams.

Don’t live there.

Are you out of ideas?  Ask God for help in finding one.

Do you have a God-given vision, but are afraid to pursue it?  Press ahead with the resources you have.

Do you have an idea, but you just aren’t committed?

Well, that’s a problem — but it isn’t an obstacle.

Cache directory "/home/content/f/w/s/fwschmidt/html/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/ttftitles/cache" is not writable.Dreamwork

September 13th, 2010

I don’t pay much attention to most of my dreams.

For one thing, I very rarely remember much about them.  For another, the vast majority of my dreams are like a combination of a train wreck and an attic and when they do make sense they probably have a lot to do with first-child syndrome: that burdened business not of feeling like God, but of having been deputized.

But tonight I awoke from a dream that left an impression.

I was sitting with my younger brother in a hospital waiting room.  To understand what happened you need to know a few things about my real-world brother, Dave.  One, he is an accomplished hand surgeon.  Two, he is the father of two great young men, one of whom is applying now to medical schools.   Three, over four years ago Dave’s active career as a surgeon came to an abrupt end when he discovered that he has a life-threatening brain tumor.  (There is a lot more that I would like to tell you, but that will need to do.)

Back to the dream:

While we sat there waiting for Dave to have some kind of treatment (my dream wasn’t real clear about what kind of treatment), I found myself talking to a nurse about the possibility of entering medical school.  Not long after that (and, again, in a way that my dream failed to account for) I found myself wearing a white coat and stethoscope; and, for some reason, I had been presented with a file detailing a patient’s needs and a surgery that needed to be done ( I never did learn who the patient was, but it was not my brother).

I felt a profound sense of satisfaction about being asked to do this and it felt great to be a physician all of a sudden, but I was also panicked at the prospect, because I also knew that I had not been to medical school.  So, for what seemed to be hours on end I began to prepare, frantically trying to learn what I would need to know in order to operate.

Finally I asked my brother for advice.  He flatly told me that I needed to advise the surgical nurse that I wasn’t ready and that I didn’t know what I was doing.  But, then he took me aside, extended his arm and told me that he was going to take me through the process, step by step, so that I would be prepared to do the operation.

That woke me up.

I am not entirely sure what that dream was all about.  But a few thoughts were front and center when I woke up:

One, I am deeply proud of my brother.  He is a determined, brilliant, disciplined, gifted man, and a bit OCD  — though he isn’t the only one in the family.  With integrity and dedication he has spent his adult life using those considerable gifts to meet the needs of others.  (As a child and teenager he spent a bit of his time doing other stuff, but didn’t we all?)

Two, I grieve the losses that he has suffered and the threat to his own life that his cancer presents.  The dream was, no doubt, about my own desire to fix something I can’t fix.

Three, I also sensed a measure of simple, profound peace there was in helping people — unalloyed by the politics and nonsense that, sadly, are as much a part of medicine as they are a part of the ordained and academic life that I live — but it is easier for me to dream about his life, than it is to dream about my own.

There is a school of thought in dream interpretation that argues that everyone in your dreams is a surrogate for things you are trying to work out in your own life.  If that’s the case, I suppose my brother represented a number of my own needs:

  • The desire to do something of clear, unalloyed benefit to others.
  • The desire to heal the wounds he and others have suffered — many of which I know full well, I cannot heal.
  • The desire of an older brother to protect and safeguard a younger brother.
  • And the desire to find a life’s work that is not spoiled by the blatant cruelty and selfishness that I have seen so often in the church.

But I don’t believe that dreams are that simple and I hope that mine aren’t that narcissistic.  I think this dream is also about pride in a brother whose work and strength I deeply admire — who has suffered losses that even after all of this time discussing them with him, I have yet to comprehend — and whose life’s work I wish he could continue.

It occurred to me, as a I write this, that just as he offered his arm, it was likely that it was the arm of Jesus as well that was extended to me.  I have no doubt that his is the only arm that can offer either one of us that kind of healing.

Why share this with you?  These observations:

  • Pay attention to the dreams that you have and can remember.
  • They may not always make sense, but from time to time they are the extension of the waking prayers and conscious struggles that mark your life.
  • If God can talk to you when you are awake, God can no doubt continue the conversation with you even when you are asleep.
  • You are the best, first interpreter of your own dreams.  Others may help you understand them, but it is important to listen to your own emerging impressions.
  • Take the impressions that arise from your sleeping prayers into your daytime, conscious prayers.  Some of what you learn in your sleep may help you live your life during the day.
  • Night or day, we are in God’s hands.

Cache directory "/home/content/f/w/s/fwschmidt/html/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/ttftitles/cache" is not writable.The truth about truth v: Three prayers

September 12th, 2010

So, what are my prayers for you?

Three things.

I pray that you don’t let the breadth of what you don’t know or what you don’t understand keep you from living out of what you know.

I pray that you will find the balance in your life that comes from truth that loves and love that speaks the truth.

And, I pray that you won’t let a misplaced fear of the truth keep you from drawing close to God… who loves you better than you love yourself.